Hip ResuRfacing 2011
نویسندگان
چکیده
In 1938 Marion Smith-Peterson placed a cobalt chromium cup on a reshaped femoral head to perform the first hip resurfacing.15 Also, in 1938, Philip Wiles performed the first total hip replacement.17 Both procedures revolutionized the treatment of hip arthritis. Most surgeons are opposed to hip resurfacing because it is difficult to perform and there is a high rate of success with total hip replacement. The early complication rate may be higher with resurfacing than total hip replacement. Total hip replacement provides very good long term results in elderly patients crippled with arthritis. Young patients present today for hip surgery hoping to perform physically demanding activities. They want a stable, durable, and highly functioning hip to match their active life style. Patients fear a difficult revision procedure if they undergo total hip replacement at a young age. The functional outcomes with hip resurfacing are superior to hip replacement. Young patients, therefore, must decide whether the theoretical and practical advantages of hip resurfacing outweigh its possible disadvantages. We describe two new innovations for hip resurfacing procedures and synthesize the most recent resurfacing data. Introduction Hip resurfacing is an attractive concept because it retains and shapes rather than replaces the natural bone. Hip resurfacing is the conservative surgical option. Total hip replacement requires resection of the entire femoral head and most of the neck. The “radical approach”, however, is the conventional practice. Compared to hip replacement, hip resurfacing promotes more consistent load transfer. Resurfacing preserves the size and shape, and natural feel of the hip. Total hip replacement has been described as “the operation of the century.”6 While this did refer to the previous century, the benefits of hip replacement are quite remarkable. Total hip replacement is the procedure of choice for most patients in need of a surgical solution for severe damage to their hip joint. Therefore, there are two valuable alternatives for hip arthritis–Hip Resurfacing and Hip Replacement. The questions requiring answers are 1) Is hip resurfacing safe? 2) Is hip resurfacing effective? and 3) What is new in hip resurfacing surgery?
منابع مشابه
Comparison of fully porous-coated and hybrid hip resurfacing: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of the first 191 fully porous-coated hip resurfacing arthroplasties with 96 hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasties performed during the same period at a minimum 2-year follow-up to evaluate the initial fixation of uncemented femoral resurfacing components. The results of this study indicate that fully porous-coated femor...
متن کاملRetrieval analysis of 240 metal-on-metal hip components, comparing modular total hip replacement with hip resurfacing.
This study compared component wear rates and pre-revision blood metal ions levels in two groups of failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: hip resurfacing and modular total hip replacement (THR). There was no significant difference in the median rate of linear wear between the groups for both acetabular (p = 0.4633) and femoral (p = 0.0872) components. There was also no significant difference...
متن کاملA comparison of leg length and femoral offset discrepancies in hip resurfacing, large head metal-on- metal and conventional total hip replacement: a case series
BACKGROUND A discrepancy in leg length and femoral offset restoration is the leading cause of patient dissatisfaction in hip replacement surgery and has profound implications on patient quality of life. The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical hip reconstruction in hip resurfacing, large-diameter femoral head hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip replacement. METHOD Sixty patie...
متن کاملThe outcomes of Cormet hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty.
INTRODUCTION Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing has provided an alternative to standard total hip arthroplasty in younger, more active patients. However, detractors argue that many of the benefits of resurfacing can be obtained with the use of larger femoral heads. The purported advantages of the resurfacing procedure include preservation of femoral bone stock, increased range of motion, decreased ...
متن کاملFinite element analysis of femoral neck stress in relation to pelvic width.
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty has been developed as an alternative to traditional total hip arthroplasty, in an effort to minimize the loss of native bone in young patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing is a unique complication; several risk factors are associated with this complication, including female gender. In the present study, we used...
متن کامل